EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 20 (2025) Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 20 (2025) 23 References
Open Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 20, 2025
Article Number 23
Number of page(s) 12
Section Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2025021
Published online 22 September 2025
  1. N. Moelans, B. Blanpain and P. Wollants, An introduction to phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution. Calphad 32 (2008) 268–294. [Google Scholar]
  2. J.W. Cahn and S.M. Allen, A microscopic theory for domain wall motion and its experimental verification in Fe–Al alloy domain growth kinetics. J. Phys. Colloq. 38 (1977) C7–51. [Google Scholar]
  3. H.-D. Alber and P. Zhu, Comparison of a rapidly converging phase field model for interfaces in solids with the Allen–Cahn model. J. Elasticity 111 (2013) 153–221. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Bouville and R. Ahluwalia, Interplay between diffusive and displacive phase transformations: Time-temperature- transformation diagrams and microstructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 055701. [Google Scholar]
  5. J.W. Cahn and J.E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J. Chem. Phys. 28 (1958) 258–267. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Pohjonen, Full field model describing phase front propagation, transformation strains, chemical partitioning, and diffusion in solid–solid phase transformations. Adv. Theory Simul. 6 (2023) 2200771. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Hallberg, A modified level set approach to 2d modeling of dynamic recrystallization. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21 (2013) 085012. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Polychronopoulou, N. Bozzolo, D.P. Muñoz, J. Bruchon, M. Shakoor, Y. Millet, C. Dumont, I.F. von Thüngen, R. Besnard and M. Bernacki, Introduction to the level-set full field modeling of laths spheroidization phenomenon in α/β titanium alloys. Int. J. Mater. Form. 12 (2019) 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  9. J.W. Christian, Theory of thermally activated growth, in The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, edited by J.W. Christian, editor. Pergamon, Oxford (2002) 480-528 (Chapter 11). [Google Scholar]
  10. P.K. Galenko and A. Salhoumi, The hodograph equation for slow and fast anisotropic interface propagation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 379 (2021) 20200324. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Jacobsson, H. Hallberg, J. Hektor, S. Iyengar and M. Ristinmaa, A level set approach to modelling diffusional phase transformations under finite strains with application to the formation of cu6sn5. Computat. Mater. Sci. 244 (2024) 113284. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Salama, M.A. Ali, O. Shchyglo and I. Steinbach, Phase-field simulation framework for modeling martensite and bainite formation in steel. Computat. Mater. Sci. 241 (2024) 113033. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Liu, D. Schneider, M. Reder, P.W. Hoffrogge and B. Nestler, Modeling of martensitic phase transformation accounting for inertia effects. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 278 (2024) 109443. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Bernacki, Kinetic equations and level-set approach for simulating solid-state microstructure evolutions at the mesoscopic scale: State of the art, limitations, and prospects. Progr. Mater. Sci. 142 (2024) 101224. [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Chandrappa and M. Bernacki, High-fidelity level-set modeling of diffusive solid-state phase transformations for polycrystalline materials. Computat. Mater. Sci. 243 (2024) 113142. [Google Scholar]
  16. L.V. Toropova, D.V. Alexandrov, P.K. Galenko and G. Demange, The shape of dendritic tips, primary stems and envelopes: morphological theory versus phase-field simulations. Computat. Mater. Sci. 244 (2024) 113223. [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Deckelnick, G. Dziuk and C.M Elliott, Computation of geometric partial differential equations and mean curvature flow. Acta Numer. 14 (2025) 139–232. [Google Scholar]
  18. R.T. Whitaker, Isosurfaces and level-sets. In Charles D. Hansen and Chris R. Johnson, editors, The Visualization Handbook. Elsevier (2005). [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Gibou, R. Fedkiw and S. Osher, A review of level-set methods and some recent applications. J. Computat. Phys. 353 (2018) 82–109. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Morigi, Geometric surface evolution with tangential contribution. J. Computat. Appl. Math. 233 (2010) 1277–1287. Special Issue Dedicated to William B. Gragg on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Osher and J.A Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. J. Computat. Phys. 79 (1988) 12–49. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Osher and R.P. Fedkiw, Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. J. Computat. Phys. 169 (2001) 463–502. [Google Scholar]
  23. J.A Sethian, Curvature and the evolution of fronts. Commun. Math. Phys. 101 (1985) 487–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R.C. Brower, D.A. Kessler, J. Koplik and H. Levine, Geometrical models of interface evolution. Phys. Rev. A 29 (1984) 1335. [Google Scholar]
  25. Comsol, Documentation. https://doc.comsol.com/6.0/doc/com.comsol.help.cfd/cfd_ug_math_levelset_phasefield.14.02.html, 2024. [Online; accessed 7 June 2024]. [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Olsson and G. Kreiss, A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J. Computat. Phys. 210 (2005) 225–246. [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Olsson, G. Kreiss and S. Zahedi, A conservative level set method for two phase flow Ii. J. Computat. Phys. 225 (2007) 785–807. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Quell, Parallel velocity extension and load-balanced re-distancing on hierarchical grids for high performance process TCAD. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien (2022). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Sussman, P. Smereka and S. Osher, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J. Computat. Phys. 114 (1994) 146–159. [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Orlando, P.F. Barbante and L. Bonaventura, On the evolution equations of interfacial variables in two-phase flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 169 (2023) 104617. [Google Scholar]
  31. S.G. Llewellyn Smith, C. Chang, T. Chu, M. Blyth, Y. Hattori and H. Salman, Generalized contour dynamics: A review. Regular Chaotic Dyn. 23 (2018) 507–518. [Google Scholar]
  32. D.I. Pullin, Contour dynamics methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24 (1992) 89–115. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Pohjonen, Moving iso-contour method for solving partial differential equations, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2675. IOP Publishing (2023) 012031. [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Pohjonen, On the geometric evolution and second order dynamics of level-sets of fields defined by partial differential equations. Working paper or preprint (2025). [Google Scholar]
  35. I. Loginova, Phase-field modeling of diffusion controlled phase transformations. PhD thesis, Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan (KTH), Mekanik (2003). [Google Scholar]
  36. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics: Landau and Lifshitz: Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 6. Elsevier (2013). [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Aksoy and M. Martelli, Mixed partial derivatives and fubini’s theorem. Coll. Math. J. 33 (2002) 126–130. [Google Scholar]
  38. A.P. de Camargo, A proof of the schwarz theorem on mixed partial derivatives via elementary approximation theory. Elemente Math. 75 (2020) 125–128. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.