Open Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 21, 2026
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 14
Section Mathematical physiology and medicine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2025013
Published online 23 March 2026
  1. K.N. Brinegar, et al., Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome: Clinical, Imaging and Pathologic Findings. World J. Radiol. 7 (2015) 375. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Butros, et al., Venous compression syndromes: clinical features, imaging findings and management. Br. J. Radiol. 86 (2013) 20130284. [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Liu, et al. , Endovascular treatment for symptomatic iliac vein compression syndrome: a prospective consecutive series of 48 patients. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 28 (2014) 695–704. [Google Scholar]
  4. Q. Radaideh, N.M. Patel and N.W. Shammas, Iliac vein compression: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Vasc. Health Risk Manage. (2019) 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Liu, et al., Endovascular treatment for symptomatic iliac vein compression syndrome: a prospective consecutive series of 48 patients. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 28 (2014) 695–704. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.K. Stuck, et al., Patency and clinical outcomes of a dedicated, self-expanding, hybrid oblique stent used in the treatment of common iliac vein compression. J. Endovasc. Ther. 24 (2017) 159–166. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Wang, et al., A systematic review of DVT and stent restenosis after stent implantation for iliac vein compression syndrome. Med. Novel Technol. Devices 15 (2022) 100125. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Li, et al., The influencing mechanism of iliac vein stent implantation for hemodynamics at the bifurcation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin. 26 (2023) 1452–1461. [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Peng, et al. , Numerical simulation in the abdominal aorta and the visceral arteries with or without stenosis based on 2D PCMRI. Int. J. Numer. Method Biomed. Eng. 38 (2022) e3569. [Google Scholar]
  10. T.B. Le, et al. , Contralateral deep vein thrombosis after iliac vein stent placement in patients with May-Thurner syndrome. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 29 (2018) 774–780. [Google Scholar]
  11. J.K. Chesnutt, H.-C.J.C.i.b. Han, and Medicine, Simulation of the microscopic process during initiation of stent thrombosis. Comput. Biol. Med. 56 (2015) 182–191. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Inoue, et al., Vascular inflammation and repair: implications for re-endothelialization, restenosis, and stent thrombosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 4 (2011) 1057–1066. [Google Scholar]
  13. B.E. Claessen, et al., Stent thrombosis: a clinical perspective. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 7 (2014) 1081–1092. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. May and J.J.A. Thurner, The cause of the predominantly sinistral occurrence of thrombosis of the pelvic veins. Angiology 8 (1957) 419–427. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Esposito, et al., A comprehensive review of the pathophysiology and clinical importance of iliac vein obstruction. 60 (2020) 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Shen, et al., Secondary flow in bifurcations - Important effects of curvature, bifurcation angle and stents. J. Biomech. 129 (2021) 110755. [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Mori and T. Saito, Effects of stent structure on stent flexibility measurements. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33 (2005) 733–742. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Huang, et al., Fusion of optical coherence tomography and angiography for numerical simulation of hemodynamics in bioresorbable stented coronary artery based on patient-specific model. Comput. Assist. Surg. (Abingdon) 22 (2017) 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  19. J.M. Hu, et al., Mechanism of effect of stenting on hemodynamics at iliac vein bifurcation. Comput. Biol. Med. 170 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Hu, et al., Mechanism of effect of stenting on hemodynamics at iliac vein bifurcation. Comput. Biol. Med. 170 (2024) 107968. [Google Scholar]
  21. Z. Fan, et al., Insights from computational fluid dynamics and in vitro studies for stent protrusion in iliac vein: how far shall we go? Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. (2024). [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Vowden, The use of intermittent pneumatic compression in venous ulceration. Br. J. Nurs. 10 (2001) 491–509. [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Sakai, et al., Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression on femoral vein peak venous velocity during active ankle exercise. J. Orthop. Surg. 29 (2021) 2309499021998105. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Lachiewicz, S. Kelley and L. Haden, Two mechanical devices for prophylaxis of thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 86 (2004) 1137–1141. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Raju, P. Tackett Jr. and P. Neglen, Reinterventions for nonocclusive iliofemoral venous stent malfunctions. J. Vasc. Surg. 49 (2009) 511–518. [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Ai, K.J.I.j.o.h. Vafai, and M. Transfer, A coupling model for macromolecule transport in a stenosed arterial wall. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Tran. 49 (2006) 1568–1591. [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Di Venuta, A. Boghi and F. Gori, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of a failed coronary stent implant at different degrees of residual stenosis. Part I: fluid dynamics and shear stress on the vascular wall. Numer. Heat Transfer A: Appl. 71 (2017) 638–652. [Google Scholar]
  28. C.M. Murtha, et al., A cadaver study evaluating intraluminal anomalies of the left common iliac vein. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. (2024) 101837. [Google Scholar]
  29. U. Morbiducci, et al., On the importance of blood rheology for bulk flow in hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation. J. Biomech. 44 (2011) 2427–2438. [Google Scholar]
  30. U. Morbiducci, et al., Quantitative analysis of bulk flow in image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: the influence of outflow conditions as test case. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38 (2010) 3688–3705. [Google Scholar]
  31. E.P. Lin, et al., The importance of monophasic Doppler waveforms in the common femoral vein: a retrospective study. J/ Ultrasound Med. 26 (2007) 885–891. [Google Scholar]
  32. E.P. Lin, S. Bhatt and V.S.J.U.C. Dogra, Lower extremity venous Doppler. 3 (2008) 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  33. L. Changsheng, et al., Influence of the anatomical structure on the hemodynamics of iliac vein stenosis. J. Biomech. Eng. 145 (2023) 011013. [Google Scholar]
  34. K.M. Saqr, et al., Evidence for non-Newtonian behavior of intracranial blood flow from Doppler ultrasonography measurements. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 57 (2019) 1029–1036. [Google Scholar]
  35. X. Zhang, et al., Hemodynamic impact of snoring on carotid artery after stent implantation: the role of oscillation. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 25 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Zhang, et al., CFD Study on Hemodynamic Characteristics of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Affected by Blood Vessel Diameter. Tech Science Press (2023). [Google Scholar]
  37. C.Q. Li, et al., Effect of stent treatment on hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome with collateral vein. Med. Eng. Phys. 115 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  38. H.W. Chen, et al., CFD Study of the Effect of the Angle Pattern on Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome. Bioengineering-Basel 10 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  39. U. Morbiducci, et al., Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. J. Biomech. Eng. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  40. A., I.Z. et al., Anultrasound imaging and computational fluid dynamics protocol to assess hemodynamics in iliac vein compression syndrome. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymph. Disord. 11 (2023) 1023–1033. [Google Scholar]
  41. K.J.B.J.o.N. Vowden, The use of intermittent pneumatic compression in venous ulceration. Br. J. Nurs. 10 (2001) 491–509. [Google Scholar]
  42. K. Sakai, et al. , A novel device for lower leg intermittent pneumatic compression synchronized with active ankle exercise for prevention of deep vein thrombosis. Phlebology 37 (2022) 507–515. [Google Scholar]
  43. Z.M. Fan, et al., Insights from computational fluid dynamics and in vitro studies for stent protrusion in iliac vein: how far shall we go? Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. (2024). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.