EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 21 (2026) Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 21 (2026) 2 References
Open Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 21, 2026
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 23
Section Mathematical methods
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2025027
Published online 24 February 2026
  1. W.O. Kermack and A.G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 115 (1927) 700–721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Großmann, M. Backenköhler and V. Wolf, Heterogeneity matters: Contact structure and individual variation shape epidemic dynamics. PLOS ONE 16 (2021) e0250050. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Nowzari, M. Ogura, V.M. Preciado and G.J. Pappas, A general class of spreading processes with non-Markovian dynamics, in 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (2015) 5073–5078. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Saeedian, M. Khalighi, N. Azimi-Tafreshi, G.R. Jafari and M. Ausloos, Memory effects on epidemic evolution: the susceptible-infected-recovered epidemic model. Phys. Rev. E 95 (2017) 022409. [Google Scholar]
  5. M.T. Sofonea, B. Reyne, B. Elie, R. Djidjou-Demasse, C. Selinger, Y. Michalakis and S. Alizon, Memory is key in capturing COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics. Epidemics 35 (2021) 100459. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Streftaris and G.J. Gibson, Non-exponential tolerance to infection in epidemic Systems - modeling, inference, and assessment. Biostatistics 13 (2012) 580–593. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Van Mieghem and R. van de Bovenkamp, Non-Markovian infection spread dramatically alters the susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic threshold in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 108701. [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Brett and T. Galla, Stochastic processes with distributed delays: chemical Langevin equation and linear-noise approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 250601. [Google Scholar]
  9. M.J. Penn, D.J. Laydon, J. Penn, C. Whittaker, C. Morgenstern, O. Ratmann, S. Mishra, M.S. Pakkanen, C.A. Donnelly and S. Bhatt, Intrinsic randomness in epidemic modelling beyond statistical uncertainty. Commun. Phys. 6 (2023)) 146. [Google Scholar]
  10. O.P. Le Maître, O.M. Knio and A. Moraes, Variance decomposition in stochastic simulators. J. Chem. Phys. 142 (2015) 244115. [Google Scholar]
  11. S.N. Ethier and T.G. Kurtz, Markov Processes - Characterization and Convergence. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (1986) , chapters 4, 6. [Google Scholar]
  12. H.M. Kouye, G. Mazo, C. Prieur and E. Vergu, Performing global sensitivity analysis on simulations of a continuous-time Markov chain model motivated by epidemiology. Computat. Appl. Math. 43 (2024) 409. [Google Scholar]
  13. D.T. Gillespie, A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Computat. Phys. 22 (1976) 403–434. [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Sellke, On the asymptotic distribution of the size of a stochastic epidemic. J. Appl. Probab. 20 (1983) 390–394. [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Reinert, The asymptotic evolution of the general stochastic epidemic. Ann. Appl. Probab. 5 (1995) 1061–1086. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Andersson and T. Britton, Stochastic Epidemic Models and Their Statistical Analysis, vol. 151 of Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer New York, New York, NY (2000). [Google Scholar]
  17. T. House, Non-Markovian stochastic epidemics in extremely heterogeneous populations. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 9 (2014) 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Di Lauro, W.R. KhudaBukhsh, I.Z. Kiss, E. Kenah, M. Jensen and G.A. Rempala, Dynamic survival analysis for non-Markovian epidemic models. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 19 (2022) 20220124. [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Britton and E. Pardoux, editors, Stochastic Epidemic Models 'with Inference, vol. 2255 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Britton and E. Pardoux, Chapter 3 General Closed Models. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019) 43–57. [Google Scholar]
  21. S.A. Lauer, K.H. Grantz, Q. Bi, F.K. Jones, Q. Zheng, H.R. Meredith, A.S. Azman, N.G. Reich and J. Lessler, The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann. Intern. Med. 172 (2020) 577–582. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. N.G. Davies, P. Klepac, Y. Liu, K. Prem, M. Jit, CMMID COVID-19 working group, C.A.B. Pearson, B.J. Quilty, A.J. Kucharski, H. Gibbs, S. Clifford, A. Gimma, K. Van Zandvoort, J.D. Munday, C. Diamond, W.J. Edmunds, R.M.G.J. Houben, J. Hellewell, T.W. Russell, S. Abbott, S. Funk, N.I. Bosse, Y.F. Sun, S. Flasche, A. Rosello, C.I. Jarvis and R.M. Eggo, Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics. Nat. Med. 26 (2020) 1205–1211. [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Locatelli, B. Trächsel and V. Rousson, Estimating the basic reproduction number for COVID-19 in western Europe. PLoS One 16 (2021) 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Prague, L. Wittkop, A. Collin, D. Dutartre, Q. Clairon, P. Moireau, R. Thiebaut and B.P. Hejblum, Multilevel modeling of early COVID-19 epidemic dynamics in French regions and estimation of the lockdown impact on infection rate. MedRxiv (2020), https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.21.20073536 [Google Scholar]
  25. C.F. Schuler, C. Gherasim, K. O'Shea, D.M. Manthei, J. Chen, C. Zettel, J.P. Troost, A.A. Kennedy, A.W. Tai, D.A. Giacherio, R. Valdez, J.L Baldwin and J.R. Baker, Mild SARS-COV-2 illness is not associated with reinfections and provides persistent spike, nucleocapsid, and virus-neutralizing antibodies. Microbiol. Spectr. 9 (2021) e0008721. [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Hoeffding, A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 19 (1948) 293–325. [Google Scholar]
  27. I.M. Sobol', Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models. Math. Model. Computat. Exp. 1 (1993) 407–414. [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Gamboa, A. Janon, T. Klein and A. Lagnoux, Sensitivity analysis for multidimensional and functional outputs. Electron. J. Statist. 8 (2014) 575–603. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Lamboni, M. Herve and M. David, Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (2011) 450–459. [Google Scholar]
  30. B. Iooss, S. Da Veiga, A. Janon, G. Pujol, with contributions from B. Broto, K. Boumhaout, T. Delage, R. El Amri, J. Fruth, L. Gilquin, J. Guillaume, L. Le Gratiet, P. Lemaitre, A. Marrel, A. Meynaoui, B.L. Nelson, F. Monari, R. Oomen, O. Rakovec, B. Ramos, O. Roustant, E. Song, J. Staum, R. Sueur, T. Touati and F. Weber, sensitivity: Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Outputs (2020). R package version 1.19.0. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Boguna, L.F. Lafuerza, R. Toral and M. Angeles Serrano, Simulating non-Markovian stochastic processes. Phys. Rev. E 90 (2014) 042108. [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Masuda and L.E.C. Rocha, A Gillespie algorithm for non-Markovian stochastic processes. SIAM Rev. 60 (2018) 95–115. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  33. C.L. Vestergaard and M. Genois, Temporal Gillespie algorithm: fast simulation of contagion processeS on time-varying networks. PLoS Computat. Biol. 11 (2015) 1–28. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.