Open Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 21, 2026
Article Number 22
Number of page(s) 39
Section Mathematical methods
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2026014
Published online 16 July 2026
  1. A.T. Balaban, editor. Chemical Applications of Graph Theory. Academic Press (1985). [Google Scholar]
  2. C.A. Coulson, On the calculation of the energy in unsaturated hydrocarbon molecules. Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 36 (1940) 201–203. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Cvetković, M. Doob and H. Sachs, Spectra of Graphs. Johann Ambrosius Barth (1995). [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Gutman and O.E. Polansky, Mathematical Concepts in Organic Chemistry. Springer Science & Business Media (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Huckel, Quantentheoretische beitrage zum benzolproblem. zum bezolproblem, quantentheoretische beitrage and zum problem, quantentheoretische beitrage. Z. Phys. Chem. 70 (1931) 204–286. [Google Scholar]
  6. J.C. Slater and G.F. Koster, Simplified LCAO method for the periodic potential problem. Phys. Rev. 94 (1954) 1498. [Google Scholar]
  7. T.B. Boykin, Recent developments in tight-binding approaches for nanowires. J. Computat. Electron. 8 (2009) 142–152. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Schulz and G.J.P.R.B. Czycholl, Tight-binding model for semiconductor nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B Condensed Matter Mater. Phys. 72 (2005) 165317. [Google Scholar]
  9. J.S. Fabila-Carrasco, F. Lledó and O. Post, Matching number, Hamiltonian graphs and magnetic Laplacian matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 642 (2022) 86–100. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Fanuel, C.M. Alaíz, Á. Fernández and J.A.K. Suykens, Magnetic eigenmaps for the visualization of directed networks. Appl. Computat. Harmonic Anal. 44 (2018) 189–199. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Fanuel and J. Suykens, Magnetic Laplacian for directed graphs. Appl. Computat. Harmonic Anal. 40 (2016) 469–509. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Furutani, T. Shibahara, M. Akiyama, K. Hato and M. Aida, Graph signal processing for directed graphs based on the Hermitian Laplacian, in Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer (2019) 447–463. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. He, M. Perlmutter, G. Reinert and M. Cucuringu, Msgnn: a spectral graph neural network based on a novel magnetic signed Laplacian, in Learning on Graphs Conference. PMLR (2022) 40–41. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Shubin, Discrete magnetic Laplacian. Commun. Math. Phys. 164 (1994) 259–275. [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Konno, Quantum walks. Lect. Notes Math. 1954 (2008) 309–452. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Kotani and T. Sunada, Zeta functions of finite graphs. J. Math. Sci. 7 (2000) 7–25. [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Liu and Y. Li, Hermitian-adjacency matrices and hermitian energies of mixed graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 466 (2015) 182–207. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Guo and B. Mohar, Hermitian adjacency matrix of digraphs and mixed graphs. J. Graph Theory 85 (2017) 217–248. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Hoser and A. Geyer-Schulz, Eigenspectral analysis of Hermitian adjacency matrices for the analysis of group substructures. J. Math. Sociol. 29 (2005) 265–294. [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Mohar, A new kind of Hermitian matrices for digraphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 584 (2020) 343–352. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Abudayah, O. Alomari and O. AbuGhneim, Inverse of Hermitian adjacency matrix of a mixed graph. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 16 (2022) 823–828. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Athmouni, H. Baloudi, M. Damak and M. Ennaceur, The magnetic discrete Laplacian inferred from the Gauß–Bonnet operator and application. Ann. Funct. Anal. 12 (2021) 33. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Cucuringu, H. Li, H. Sun and L. Zanetti, Hermitian matrices for clustering directed graphs: insights and applications, in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR (2020) 983–992. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Jahanbani, On the Hermitian Estrada index of mixed graphs. Int. J. Appl. Graph Theory 3 (2019) 14–28. [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Ji, W. Wang and H. Zhang, Mixed graphs determined by their generalized Hermitian adjacency spectrum based on Eisenstein integers. Electron. J. Combinatorics 32 (2025) 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Kubota, E. Segawa and T. Taniguchi, Quantum walks defined by digraphs and generalized Hermitian adjacency matrices. Quant. Inform. Process. 20 (2021) 95. [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Li and T. Yu, Hermitian adjacency spectrum of Cayley digraphs over dihedral group, in Algebra Colloquium, vol. 27. World Scientific (2020) 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Li and Y. Yu, Hermitian adjacency matrix of the second kind for mixed graphs. Discrete Math. 345 (2022) 112798. [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Mohar, Hermitian adjacency spectrum and switching equivalence of mixed graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 489 (2016) 324–340. [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Peron, B.M.F. de Resende, F.A. Rodrigues, L. da F. Costa and J.A. Méndez-Bermúdez, Spacing ratio characterization of the spectra of directed random networks. Phys. Rev. E 102 (2020) 062305. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Sanchez, R. Caire and N. Hadjsaid, Application of Hermitian adjacency matrices for the vulnerability analysis of power systems. IEEE PES ISGT Europe (2013). [Google Scholar]
  32. Z. Wang, T. She and C. Wang, The index weighted Hermitian adjacency matrices for mixed graphs. Utilitas Math. 119 (2024) 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Peierls, Zur theorie des diamagnetismus von leitungselektronen. Z. Phys. 80 (1933) 763–791. [Google Scholar]
  34. D.R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 14 (1976) 2239–2249. [Google Scholar]
  35. I. Gutman, The energy of a graph. Berichte Math.-Stat. Sektion Forsch. Graz 103 (1978) 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  36. I. Gutman and X. Li, Graph Energy. Springer (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Estrada and M. Benzi, What is the graph energy? Linear Algebra Appl. 544 (2018) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  38. Y. Huang, D.F. Gleich and P. Li, Powers of magnetic graph matrix: Fourier spectrum, walk compression, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07343 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Kishigi and Y. Hasegawa, Quantum oscillations of magnetization in tight-binding electrons on a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 085427. [Google Scholar]
  40. Y. Saad, Numerical Methods for Large Eigenvalue Problems. SIAM (2011). [Google Scholar]
  41. Y. Cui, et al., Electrically conductive two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 10466. [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Ko, L. Mendecki and K.A. Mirica, Conductive two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks: design, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 7873–7891. [Google Scholar]
  43. A.P. Horsfield and A.M. Bratkovsky, Ab initio tight binding. J. Phys. Condensed Matter 12 (2000) R1-R24. [Google Scholar]
  44. F. Liu, M.R. Press, S.N. Khanna and P. Jena, Magnetism and local order: ab initio tight-binding theory. Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 6914. [Google Scholar]
  45. Y. Cao, J. Romero, J.P. Olson, et al., Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 10856–10915. [Google Scholar]
  46. S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S.C. Benjamin and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 (2020) 015003. [Google Scholar]
  47. IQmol Project Contributors, Polyaromatic hydrocarbon molecular coordinates. https://github.com/nutjunkie/IQmol/tree/master/share/fragments/Molecules/Polyaromatic_Hydrocarbons (2026). Accessed: 2026-02-12. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.