EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 / No 6 (2011) Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 6 6 (2011) 198-214 References
Free Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 6, Number 6, 2011
Biomathematics Education
Page(s) 198 - 214
Section Continuous Modeling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20116610
Published online 05 October 2011
  1. J. Bransford, J. Franks, N. Vye, R. Sherwood (1989). New Approaches to Instruction: Because Wisdom Can’t be Told. In S. Vosiadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 470–497). New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Burrowes. A student-centered approach to teaching general biology that really works: Lord’s constructivist model put to a test. Am. Biol. Teach., 65 (2003), No. 7, 491–502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Centers for Disease Control (2004). Smallpox Fact Sheet: Vaccine Overview. Available online at ⟨ http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/vaccination/facts.asp ⟩ ; last accessed on 1/20/2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Ewing, K. Hogan, F. Keesing, H. Bugmann, A. Berkowitz, L. Gross, J. Oris, J. Wright (2003). “The role of modeling in undergraduate education”. Pages 413427 in Canham CD, Cole JJ, Laurenroth WK, eds. Models in Ecosystem Science. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Freeman. Biological Science, 4th edition. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Hake. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys., 66 (1998), No. 1, 64–74. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Hodder, D. Ebert-May, and J. Batzli. Coding to analyze students’ critical thinking. Front. Ecol. Environ., 4 (2006), No. 3, 162–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Johnson (2005). “Infectious Disease and Bioterrorism.” In PH Raven, GB Johnson, J Losos, and S Singer, Biology, 7th edition (Enhancement Chapter 33e). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Jungck (2005). “Challenges, Connections, Complexities: Educating for Collaboration”. Pages 1–12 in Math and Bio 2010: Linking Undergraduate Disciplines (ed. LA Steen). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Jungck and J. Calley. Strategic simulations and post-Socratic pedagogy: Constructing computer software to develop long-term inference through experimental inquiry. Am. Biol. Teach., 47 (1985), No. 1, 11–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Kastens (2002). My Top Ten Topics in Geoscience Education Research, for a conference on “Bringing Research on Learning to the Geosciences.” http://serc.carleton.edu/files/research_on_learning/KKtopten.pdf (accessed 1/17/2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Kermack and A. McKendrick. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 115 (1927), No. 772, 700–721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Kitchen, J. Bell, S. Reeve, R. Sudweeks, W. Bradshaw. Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: Methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness. Cell Biol. Educ., 2 (2003), No. 3, 180–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Knight and W. Wood. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol. Educ., 4 (2005), No. 4, 298–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, and Berry JK (2003). “The Status of Dynamic Quantitative Modeling in Ecology”. Pages 32–48 in Canham CD, Cole JJ, Laurenroth WK, eds. Models in Ecosystem Science. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Meltzer, I. Damon, J. LeDuc, J. Millar. Modeling Potential Responses to Smallpox as a Bioterrorist Weapon. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 7 (2001), No. 6, 959–969. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. National Research Council. Bio 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 2003. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Reece, L. Urry, M. Cain, S. Wasserman, P. Minorsky, and R. Jackson. Campbell Biology, 9th edition. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. SENCER: Science Education for New Civic Engagements and Responsibilities. ⟨ www.sencer.net ⟩ . Accessed 13 January 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Trempy, M. Skinner, W. Siebold. Learning microbiology through cooperation: Designing cooperative learning activities that promote interdependence, interaction, and accountability. Microbiol. Educ., 3 (2002), No. 1, 26–36. [Google Scholar]
  21. Turner, MG (2003). “Modeling for Synthesis and Integration: Forests, People, and Riparian Coarse Woody Debris”. Pages 83–110 in Canham CD, Cole JJ, Laurenroth WK, eds. Models in Ecosystem Science. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Udovic, D. Morris, A. Dickman, J. Postlethwait, P. Wetherwax. Workshop Biology: Demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. BioScience, 52 (2002), No. 3, 272–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.