Free Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 7, Number 6, 2012
Biological oscillations
Page(s) 47 - 66
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20127603
Published online 12 December 2012
  1. D. Barthélémy, Y. Caraglio. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany, 99 (2007), No. 3, 375–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. C.C. Berg, P. Franco, Flora neotropica monograph 94. Cecropia. Organization for Flora Neotropica. 2005. New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, New York, USA.
  3. P.-H. Cournède, M.Z. Kang, A. Mathieu, J.-F. Barczi, H.P. Yan, B.G. Hu, P. de Reffye, Structural factorization of plants to compute their functional and architectural growth. Simulation, 82 (2006), No. 7, 427–438. [CrossRef]
  4. P.-H. Cournède, V. Letort, A. Mathieu, M.Z. Kang, S. Lemaire, S. Trevezas, F. Houllier, P. de Reffye. Some Parameter Estimation Issues in Functional-Structural Plant Modelling. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom, 6(2) (2011), 133–159. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  5. J. Evers, J. Vos, X. Yin, P. Romero, P.E.L. van der Putten, P.C. Struik. Simulation of wheat growth and development based on organ-level photosynthesis and assimilate allocation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61 (2010), 2203–2216 doi:10.1093/jxb/erq025. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. Evers, A. van der Krol, J. Vos, P.C. Struik. Understanding shoot branching by modelling form and function. Trends in Plant Science, 16 (2011), 464–467. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. T. Fourcaud, X.P. Zhang, A. Stokes, H. Lambers, C. Körner. Plant growth modelling and applications: The increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Annals of Botany, 101 (2008), No. 8, 1053–1063. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. C. Godin. Representing and encoding plant architecture: a review. Annals of Forest Science, 57 (2000), 413–438. [CrossRef]
  9. Y. Guédon, D. Barthélémy, Y. Caraglio, E. Costes. Pattern Analysis in Branching and Axillary Flowering Sequences. Journal of theoretical biology, 212 (2001), 481–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. E. Heuvelink. Dry Matter Partitioning in Tomato: Validation of a Dynamic Simulation Model. Annals of Botany, 77 (1996), 71–80. [CrossRef]
  11. E. Heuvelink. Evaluation of a Dynamic Simulation Model for Tomato Crop Growth and Development. Annals of Botany, 83 (1999), 413–422. [CrossRef]
  12. P. Heuret, D. Barthélémy, Y. Guédon, X. Coulmier, J. Tancre. Synchronization of growth, branching and flowering processes in the south american tropical tree Cecropia obtusa (Cecropiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 89 (2002), No. 7, 1180–1187. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. F. Hallé, R.A.A. Oldeman. Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Masson, Paris, 1970.
  14. S. Kirkpatrick, C. Gelatt, M. Vecchi. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220 (1983), 671–680. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  15. K. Kitajima, S. Mulkey, M. Samaniego, and J. Wright. Decline of photosynthetic capacity with leaf age and position in two tropical pioneer species. American Journal of Botany, 89 (2002), No. 12, 1925–1932. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Functional Plant Biology, 35 (2008), No. 10, 1243–1254. [CrossRef]
  17. V. Letort, P. Heuret, P.C. Zalamea, E. Nicolini, P. de Reffye. Analysis of Cecropia sciadophylla Morphogenesis Based on a Sink-Source Dynamic Model. International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling and Applications (PMA09), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. (2009), 10–17.
  18. V. Letort, P. Heuret, P.C. Zalamea, E. Nicolini, P. de Reffye. Analysing the effects of local environment on the source-sink balance of Cecropia sciadophylla: a methodological approach based on model inversion. Annals of Forest Science, 69 (2012), 167–180. [CrossRef]
  19. D. Luquet, M. Dingkuhn, H.K. Kim, L. Tambour, A. Clément-Vidal. EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 1. Concept, validation and sensitivity analysis. Functional Plant Biology, 33 (2006), 309–323. doi: 10.1071/FP05266 [CrossRef]
  20. Y.T. Ma, A.M. Wubs, A. Mathieu, E. Heuvelink, J.Y. Zhu, B.G. Hu, P.-H. Cournède, P. deReffye. Simulation of fruit-set and trophic competition and optimization of yield advantages in six Capsicum cultivars using functional-structural plant modelling. Annals of Botany, 107 (2011), 793–803. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. L.F.M. Marcelis. A Simulation Model for Dry Matter Partitioning in Cucumber. Annals of Botany, 74 (1994), 43–52. [PubMed]
  22. L.F.M. Marcelis, E. Heuvelink, L. Baan Hofman-Eijer, J. Den Bakker, L.B. Xue. Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55 (2004), 22-1–2268.
  23. A. Mathieu, P.-H. Cournède, D. Barthélémy, P. de Reffye. Conditions for the Generation of Rhythms in a Discrete Dynamic System. Case of a Functional Structural Plant Growth Model. 2nd International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications (PMA06), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. (2007), 26–33.
  24. A. Mathieu, B.G. Zhang, E. Heuvelink, S.J. Liu, P.-H. Cournède, P. de Reffye. Calibration of fruit cyclic patterns in cucumber plants as a function of source-sink ratio with the Greenlab model. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on FSPM (P. Prusinkiewicz, J. Hanan, eds.), November 2007.
  25. A. Mathieu, P.-H. Cournède, V. Letort, D. Barthélémy, P. de Reffye. A dynamic model of plant growth with interactions between development and functional mechanisms to study plant structural plasticity related to trophic competition. Annals of Botany, 103 (2009), 1173–1186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. Mathieu, P.-H. Cournède, D. Barthélémy, P. de Reffye. Rhythms and alternating patterns in plants as emergent properties of a model of interaction between development and functioning. Annals of Botany, 101 (2008), No. 8, 1233–1242. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. M.V. Mickelbart, G.S. Bender, G.W. Witney, C. Adams, M.L. Arpaia. Effects of clonal rootstocks on ’Hass’ avocado yield components, alternate bearing, and nutrition. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 82 (2007), 460–466.
  28. S.P. Monselise, E.E. Goldschmidt. Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Horticultural Reviews. 4 (1982), 128–173.
  29. P. de Reffye, M. Goursat, J.-P. Quadrat, and B.G. Hu. The Dynamic Equations of the Tree Morphogenesis Greenlab Model. Technical Report 4877, INRIA, (2003).
  30. S. Sabatier, D. Barthélémy. Growth dynamics and morphology of annual shoots according to their architectural position in young Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti ex Carrière (pinaceae). Annals of Botany, 84 (1999), 387–392. [CrossRef]
  31. A. Schapendonk, P. Brouwer. Fruit growth of cucumber in relation to assimilate supply and sink activity. Scientia Horticulturae 23 (1984), 21-33. [CrossRef]
  32. J. Schupp. Alternate Bearing in Fruit Crops. PennState Technical Report, 2011: http://extension.psu.edu/fruit-times/news/2011/alternate-bearing-in-fruit-crops
  33. K. Shinozaki, K. Yoda, K. Hozumi, T. Kira. A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory i. basic analysis. Japanese Journal of Ecology., 14 (1964), 97–105.
  34. R. Sievänen, E. Nikinmaa, P. Nygren, H. Ozier-Lafontaine, J. Perttunen, H. Hakula. Components of a functional-structural tree model. Annals of Forest Sciences, 57 (2000), 399–412. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  35. U. Van Meeteren, H. Van Gelder. Role of flower buds in flower bud abscission in Hibiscus. Acta Horticulturae (1995), 284-289.
  36. J.S. Verreynne, C.J. Lovatt. The Effect of Crop Load on Budbreak Influences Return Bloom in Alternate Bearing ’Pixie’ Mandarin. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 134 (2009), 299–307.
  37. J. Warren-Wilson. Ecological data on dry matter production by plants and plant communities. The collection and processing of field data (E.F. Bradley, O.T. Denmead, eds.), Interscience Publishers, New York, 1967, pp. 77–123.
  38. P.C. Zalamea, P.R. Stevenson, S. Madrinan, P.M. Aubert, P. Heuret. Growth pattern and age determination for Cecropia sciadophylla (Urticaceae). American Journal of Botany, 95 (2008), 263–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.