EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 20 (2025) Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 20 (2025) 28 References
Open Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 20, 2025
Article Number 28
Number of page(s) 38
Section Mathematical methods
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2025030
Published online 24 December 2025
  1. F. Barros-Becker, P.Y. Lam, R. Fisher and A. Huttenlocher, Live imaging reveals distinct modes of neutrophil and macrophage migration within interstitial tissues. J. Cell Sci. 130 (2017) 3801–3808. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Friedl and B. Weigelin, Interstitial leukocyte migration and immune function. Nat. Immunol. 9 (2008) 960–969. [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Van Goethem, R. Poincloux, F. Gauffre, I. Maridonneau-Parini and V. Le Cabec, Matrix architecture dictates three-dimensional migration modes of human macrophages: differential involvement of proteases and podosome-like structures. J. Immunol. 184 (2010) 1049–1061. [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Li, B. Yan, Y.Q. Shi, W.Q. Zhang and Z.L. Wen, Live imaging reveals differing roles of macrophages and neutrophils during zebrafish tail fin regeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (2012) 25353–25360. [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Min, Electrical fields in wound healing-an overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20 (2009) 674–682. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Sipka, R. Peroceschi, M. Groß, F. Ellett, C. Pescia, C. Gonzalez, G. Lutfalla and M. Nguyen-Chi, Damage-induced calcium signaling and reactive oxygen species mediate macrophage activation in zebrafish. Front. Immunol. 12 (2021) ID 636585. [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Kadirkamanathan, S.R. Anderson, S.A. Billings, X. Zhang, G.R. Holmes, et al., The neutrophil's eye-view: Inference and visualisation of the chemoattractant field driving cell chemotaxis in vivo. PLoS One 7 (2012) e35182. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Ellett, L. Pase, J. Hayman, A. Andrianopoulos and G. Lieschke, Mpeg1 promoter transgenes direct macrophage-lineage expression in zebrafish. Blood 117 (2011) e49-e56. [Google Scholar]
  9. S.A. Park, T. Sipka, Z. Krivá, M. Nguyen-Chi, G. Lutfalla and K. Mikula, Segmentation-based tracking of macrophages in 2d+time microscopy movies inside a living animal. Comput. Biol. Med. 153 (2023) 106499. [Google Scholar]
  10. T.Y. Hou, J.S. Lowengrub and M.J. Shelley, Removing the stiffness from interfacial flows with surface tension. J. Computat. Phys. 114 (1994) 312–338. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Kimura, Numerical analysis of moving boundary problems using the boundary tracking method. Japan J. Ind. Appl. Math. 14 (1997) 373–398. [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Mikula and D. Sevœvic, Evolution of plane curves driven by a nonlinear function of curvature and anisotropy. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 61 (2001) 1473–1501. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Mikula and D. Sevœvic, A direct method for solving an anisotropic mean curvature flow of plane curves with an external force. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 27 (2004) 1545–1565. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Sevœvic and S. Yazaki, Evolution of plane curves with a curvature adjusted tangential velocity. Japan J. Ind. Appl. Math. 28 (2011) 413–442. [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Mikula, D. Sevœvic and M. Balazovjech, A simple, fast and stabilized flowing finite volume method for solving general curve evolution equations. Commun. Computat. Phys. 7 (2010) 195–211. [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Mikula, J. Urban, M. Kollâr, M. Ambroz, I. Jarolîmek, J. Sibik and M. Sibikova. An automated segmentation of natura 2000 habitats from sentinel-2 optical data. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. 14 (2021) 1017–1032. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Ambroz, M. Balazovjech, M. Medl'a and K. Mikula, Numerical modeling of wildland surface fire propagation by evolving surface curves. Adv. Computat. Math. 45 (2019) 1067–1103. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Lupi, K. Mikula and S.A. Park, Macrophages trajectories smoothing by evolving curves. Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 86 (2023) pp. 145–170. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Arcizet, B. Meier, E. Sackmann, J.O. Radler and D. Heinrich. Temporal analysis of active and passive transport in living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 248103. [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Kubala, M. Ciesla and B. Dybiec, Diffusion in crowded environments: Trapped by the drift. Phys. Rev. E 104 (2021) 044127. [Google Scholar]
  21. I.M. Sokolov, Models of anomalous diffusion in crowded environments. Soft Matter 8 (2012) 9043–9052. [Google Scholar]
  22. G.M. Viswanathan, M.G.E. Da Luz, E.P. Raposo and H.E. Stanley, The Physics of Foraging: An Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters. Cambridge University Press (2011). [Google Scholar]
  23. K. De Bruin, N. Ruthardt, K. Von Gersdorff, R. Bausinger, E. Wagner, M. Ogris and C. Bräuchle, Cellular dynamics of egf receptor-targeted synthetic viruses. Mol. Ther. 15 (2007) 1297–1305. [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Daumas, N. Destainville, C. Millot, A. Lopez, D. Dean and L. Salome, Confined diffusion without fences of a g-protein-coupled receptor as revealed by single particle tracking. Biophys. J. 84 (2003) 356–366. [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Dieterich, R. Klages, R. Preuss and A. Schwab, Anomalous dynamics of cell migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 (2008) 459–463. [Google Scholar]
  26. T.H. Harris, E.J. Banigan, D.A. Christian, et al., Generalized levy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector cd8+ t cells. Nature 486 (2012) 545–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Huda, B. Weigelin, K. Wolf, et al., Levy-like movement patterns of metastatic cancer cells revealed in microfabricated systems and implicated in vivo. Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 4539. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Kusumi, Y. Sako and M. Yamamoto, Confined lateral diffusion of membrane receptors as studied by single particle tracking (nanovid microscopy). effects of calcium-induced differentiation in cultured epithelial cells. Biophys. J. 65 (1993) 2021–2040. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. G.M. Lee, A. Ishihara and K.A. Jacobson, Direct observation of Brownian motion of lipids in a membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88 (1991) 6274–6278. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Fisher, P. Schröder, M. Desbrun and H. Hoppe, Design of tangent vector fields. ACM Trans. Graph. 26 (2007) 56—es. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Lage, F. Petronetto, A. Paiva, H. Lope, T. Lewiner and G. Tavares, Vector field reconstruction from sparse samples with applications, in 19th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing (2006) 297–306. [Google Scholar]
  32. K. Mikula, M. Ambroz and R. Mokosova, What was the river Ister in the time of Strabo? A mathematical approach. Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 80 (2021) 71–118. [Google Scholar]
  33. F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, From basis functions to basis fields: vector field approximation from sparse data. Biol. Cybernet. 67 (1992) 479–489. [Google Scholar]
  34. Z. Belhachmi, D. Bucur, B. Burgeth and J. Weickert, How to choose interpolation data in images. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70 (2009) 333–352. [Google Scholar]
  35. C.-B. Schönlieb, Partial Differential Equation Methods for Image Inpainting. Cambridge University Press (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Lupi and K. Mikula, Vector field reconstruction from sparse samples by triple-laplacian, in Proceedings of the Conference Algoritmy (2024) 85–98. [Google Scholar]
  37. K. Mikula and M. Ohlberger, Inflow-implicit/outflow-explicit scheme for solving advection Equations, in Finite Volumes in Complex Applications VI, Problems & Perspectives (2011) 683–692. [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Ambroz, M. Kollar and K. Mikula, Semi-implicit scheme for semi-automatic segmentation in naturasat Software, in Proceedings of the Conference Algoritmy (2020) 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  39. B.M. Regner, D. Vucinic, C. Domnisoru, T.M. Bartol, M.W. Hetzer, D.M. Tartakovsky and T.J. Sejnowski, Anomalous diffusion of single particles in cytoplasm. Biophys. J. 104 (2013) 1652–1660. [Google Scholar]
  40. N. Ruthardt, D.C. Lamb and C. Bräuchle, Single-particle tracking as a quantitative microscopy-based approach to unravel cell entry mechanisms of viruses and pharmaceutical nanoparticles. Mol. Ther. 19 (2011) 1199–1211. [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Necas, Direct Methods in the Theory of Elliptic Equations. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). [Google Scholar]
  42. K. Rektorys, Variational Methods in Mathematics, Science and Engineering. Springer (2012). [Google Scholar]
  43. G. Lupi and K. Mikula, Time dependent vector field reconstruction of moving macrophages- modeling, discretization, and results. Proceedings of the Conference CISP-BMEI (2025) pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. S.A. Park, G. Lupi, R. Ozbilgic, M.N. Chi and K. Mikula, Morpho-kinetic profiling of different modes of macrophages during wound healing in zebrafish. Work Prog. (2024). Manuscript in preparation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.10552. [Google Scholar]
  45. G. Lupi et al. Datasets for "Mathematical and numerical methods for understanding immune cell motion during wound healing". Available on Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17833359 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.