EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 / No 5 (2009) Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 4 5 (2009) 72-88 References
Free Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 4, Number 5, 2009
Modelling of geographical processes and natural resources
Page(s) 72 - 88
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20094505
Published online 02 October 2009
  1. D.J. Connor, B.R. Tunstall, R. Van den Driessche An analysis of photosynthetic response in an brigalow forest. Photosynthetica, 5 (1971), No 3, 218–225. [Google Scholar]
  2. H.S. Horn. Markovian properties of forest succession. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Cambridge, Belknap, 1975, 196–211. [Google Scholar]
  3. H.S. Horn. Some causes of variety in patterns of forest succession. Forest Succession: Concepts and Applications. N.Y., Springer-Verlag, 1991, 24–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. A.K. Cherkashin. Forecasting the spatial and temporal dynamics of forests of taiga landscape. Dynamics of Ecologo-Economic Systems. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1981, 107-111. [Google Scholar]
  5. D.L. Urban, M.E. Harmon, C.B.Halpern. Potential response of Pacific Northwestern forests to climatic change, effects of stand age and initial composition. Climatic Change, 23 (1993), 247–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Fischlin, H. Bugmann, D. Gyalistras. Sensitivity of a forest ecosystem model to climate parameterization schemes. Environmental Pollution, 87 (1995), 267–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H.K.M. Bugmann. A simplified forest model to study species composition along climate gradients. Ecology, 77 (1996), 2055–2074. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A.V. Benkov, V.A. Ryzhkova. Assessment and modeling of the dynamics of the southern-taiga pine forests in Middle Siberia. Lesovedeniye, 1 (2001), 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  9. I.N. Vladimirov. Mapping of regenerative and age dynamics of taiga forests on the basis of remote sensing data, geographical knowledge and mathematical models. Journal of Remote Sensing, 11 (2007), No 5, 732–744. [Google Scholar]
  10. H.H. Shugart, T.R. Crow, J.M. Hett. Forest succession models: a rational and methodology for modeling forest succession over large regions. Forest Science, 19 (1973), No 3, 203–212. [Google Scholar]
  11. H.H. Shugart. A Theory of forest dynamics. The ecological implications of forest succession models. N.Y., Springer, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  12. A.K. Cherkashin. The use of a mathematical model in forecasting the recovery of the structure of taiga biogeocenoses after tree felling. Structure and Dynamics of Geosystems. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1979, 97–110. [Google Scholar]
  13. A.K. Cherkashin. The model for the dynamics of forest stands of a district forestry and its use in solving prediction problems. Planning and Forecasting of Natural-Economic Systems. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1984, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
  14. A.K. Cherkashin. The expanding complex of particular models. Forest. Systemic Research Into a Region's Nature – Economy Interaction. Irkutsk University Publisher, 1986, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  15. D.J. Mladenoff, H.S. He. Design and behavior of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession. Advances in Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1999, 125–162. [Google Scholar]
  16. D.J. Mladenoff, G.E. Host, J. Boeder, T.R. Crow. LANDIS: a spatial model of forest landscape disturbance, succession, and management. GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues. GIS World Inc., 1996. 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  17. N.N. Moiseyev. System analysis of dynamical processes of the biosphere. Vestnik AN SSSR, 1 (1979), 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Luan, R.I. Muetzelfeldt, J. Grace. Hierarchical approach to forest ecosystem simulation. Ecological Modelling, 86 (1996), 37–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Wu, J.L. David. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecological Modelling, 153 (2002), 7–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Makela. Process-based modelling of tree and stand growth: towards a hierarchical treatment of multiscale processes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33 (2003), 398–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D.C. Bragg, D.W. Roberts, T.R. Crow. A hierarchical approach for simulating northern forest dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 173 (2004), 31–94 [Google Scholar]
  22. I.N. Vladimirov. The uniqueness of predictive dynamical models as the geographical problem. Geography: New methods and Prospects of a Future Advancement: proc. 15th Conf. of Young Geographers of Siberia and the Far East. Institute of Geography SB RAS Publisher, 2003, 155–157. [Google Scholar]
  23. V.D. Nogin. A logical rationale for the Edgeworth-Pareto principle. Zhurnal vychislitelnoi matematiki i matematicheskoi fiziki, 42 (2002), No. 7, 950–956. [Google Scholar]
  24. V.D. Nogin. The Edgeworth-Pareto principle and the relative importance of the criteria in the case of a fuzzy preference relation. Zhurnal vychislitelnoi matematiki i matematicheskoi fiziki, 43 (2003), No. 11, 1676–1686. [Google Scholar]
  25. E.A. Cherkashin, A.K. Chudnenko, I.N. Vladimirov. The intelligent information system for forest stand management dynamics within the context of the problem of developing the decision-making support system for rational utilization of forest resources. InterCarto/InterGIS 10. International Cartographic Association, 2004, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  26. I.N. Vladimirov, A.K. Chudnenko. Forecasting of the spatio-temporal dynamics of the forest resources of the Irkutsk region using GIS technologies. Sun. Earth, Water, and Energy. Transactions of the Siberian Division of APVN, issue 2. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2005, 61–68. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.