EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 / No 6 (2014) Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 9 6 (2014) 46-68 References
Free Access
Issue
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 9, Number 6, 2014
Blood flows
Page(s) 46 - 68
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20149605
Published online 31 July 2014
  1. A.M. Gambaruto, J. Janela, A. Moura, A. Sequeira. Sensitivity of hemodynamics in a patient specific cerebral aneurysm to vascular geometry and blood rheology. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 8 (2011), no. 2, 409–423. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Quarteroni, L. Formaggia. Mathematical modelling and numerical simulation of the cardiovascular system. P.G. Ciarlet (ED.),Handbook of numerical analysis, vol XII, North-Holland, Amsterdam, (2004), 3–127. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Cioranescu. Sur une classe de fluides non newtoniens. App. Math. and Opt, 3 (1977), no. 2/3, 263–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Hecht, G. Martin-Borret, M. Thiriet. Écoulement rhéofluidifiant dans un coude et une bifurcation plane symétrique. Application à l’écoulement sanguin dans la grande circulation. J. Phys., 3 (1996), France 6, 529–542. [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Nobile. Numerical approximation of fluid-structure interaction problems with application to haemodynamics. EPFL. PhD thesis, Lausanne, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Holzapfel, T. Gasser, R. Ogden. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. Journal of Elasticity, 61 (2000), 1–48. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Janela, A. Moura, A. Sequeira. A 3D non-Newtonian fluid-structure interaction model for blood flow in arteries. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234 (2010), 2783–2791. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Temam. Navier-Stokes equations: theory and numerical analysis. Amsterdam; New York: North-Holland, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Ait Moudid. Couplage fluide-structure pour la simulation numérique des écoulements fluides dans une conduite à parois rigides ou élastiques, en présence d’obstacles ou non. Université d’Artois. PhD thesis, Compiègne, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. M.X. Li, J.J. Beech-Brandt, L.R. John, P.R. Hoskins, W.J. Easson. Numerical analysis of pulsatile blood flow and vessel wall mechanics in different degrees of stenoses. Journal of Biomechanics, 40 (2007), 3715–3724. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. El Khatib. Modélisation mathématique de l’athérosclérose. Université Claude Bernard – Lyon 1. PhD thesis, Lyon, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. P.A. Raviart, J.M. Thomas. Introduction à l’analyse numérique des équations aux dérivées partielles. Masson, Paris, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Crosetto, P. Raymond, S. Deparis, D. Kontaxakis, N. Stergiopulos, A. Quarteroni. Fluid-structure interaction simulations of physiological blood flow in the aorta. Computers and Fluids. Elsevier, 43 (2011), no. 1, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Aboulaich, S. Boujena, E. El Guarmah. A non linear diffusion model with non homogeneous boundary conditions in image restoration. Esc10 Milan, (2009), 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Boujena. Étude d’une classe de fluides non-Newtoniens, les fluides Newtoniens généralisés. Thèse de troisième cycle. Univ. Pierre et Marrie-Currie, Paris 6, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  16. T.G. Papaioannou, Christodoulos Stefanadis. Vascular wall shear stress: basic principles and methods. Hellenic J Cardiol 46, (2005), 9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y.C. Fung. Biomechanics: Mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  18. Z.Y. Li, Simon P.S. Howarth, Tjun Tang, Jonathan H. Gillard. How critical is fibrous cap thickness to carotid plaque stability? A flow-plaque interaction model. Stroke 37, (2006), 1195–1196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.