Issue 
Math. Model. Nat. Phenom.
Volume 15, 2020
Coronavirus: Scientific insights and societal aspects



Article Number  31  
Number of page(s)  13  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2020016  
Published online  14 May 2020 
A multiscale model quantifies the impact of limited movement of the population and mandatory wearing of face masks in containing the COVID19 epidemic in Morocco
Team Complex Systems and Interactions, Central School of Casablanca,
Casablanca, Morocco.
^{*} Corresponding author: anass.bouchnita@centralecasablanca.ma
Received:
23
April
2020
Accepted:
26
April
2020
The coronavirus disease (COVID19) pandemic emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and caused a serious threat to global public health. In Morocco, the first confirmed COVID19 case was reported on March 2, 2020. Since then, several nonpharmaceutical interventions were used to slow down the spread of the disease. In this work, we use a previously developed multiscale model of COVID19 transmission dynamics to quantify the effects of restricting population movement and wearing face masks on disease spread in Morocco. In this model, individuals are represented as agents that move, become infected, transmit the disease, develop symptoms, go into quarantine, die by the disease, or become immunized. We describe the movement of agents using a social force model and we consider both modes of direct and indirect transmission. We use the model to simulate the impact of restricting the movement of the population movement and mandating the wearing of masks on the spread of COVID19. The model predicts that adopting these two measures would reduce the total number of cases by 64%. Furthermore, the relative incidence of indirect transmission increases when control measures are adopted.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35L05 / 35L70
Key words: SARSCoV2 / COVID19 / nonpharmaceutical interventions / multiscale modelling
© The authors. Published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) is a highly transmissible virus that emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 [10]. Since then, coronavirus disease (COVID19) has infected more than two million individual around the world, as of April 15 2020. Infectious individuals secrete droplets that contain the virus during coughs and sneezes. As a result, susceptible individuals can directly inhale these droplets during close contact with infectious persons. These droplets also contaminate hard surfaces and can cause the subsequent infection of susceptible individuals. This mode of indirect transmission is important in the case of COVID19 because stable SARSCoV2 can remain for a few days on some type of hard surfaces like plastic and stainless steel [19].
In the absence of effective vaccines or therapeutics, public health adopted nonpharmaceutical interventions as a strategy to slow down the spread of the pandemic [21]. These interventions include social distancing measures which aim to impose a minimum distance that has to be kept between individuals. Thus, reducing the chances of persontoperson contact. Other interventions minimise the chances of disease transmission during contact. This can be done by promoting hygiene practices, maskwearing, and cough etiquette. The rest of nonpharmaceutical interventions decrease the chances of indirect transmission by frequently disinfecting public areas and products.
The first confirmed COVID19 case in Morocco was reported on March 2, 2020. Since then, authorities have adopted several measures to slow down the propagation of the epidemic. First, international flights were gradually suspended. Next, school and university closures were mandated while opting for distance learning alternatives. A state of health emergency was declared on March 19, 2020 which limits the movement of the population to essentials. Finally, the use of face masks by individuals during movements was mandated on April 6, 2020. These measures will certainly slow the spread of COVID19. However, the effect of each of them on the epidemic curve remains hard to quantify.
Mathematical modelling provides a tool to better understand the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. Compartmental models are one of the most widely used to describe the dynamics of epidemics. In this framework, the changes in the populations of several classes of interacting individuals are described using ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Susceptibleinfectedrecovered (SIR) is one of the most commonly used types of compartmental models in epidemiology [2]. A recent SIR model which takes into consideration the effect of quarantine was formulated and used to estimate the basic reproduction number (R_{0}) in China, Korea, and Italy [20]. Susceptibleexposedinfectiousrecovered (SEIR) is another class of compartmental models that is used to simulate the transmission dynamics of diseases with a relatively long incubation period. These models were also used to estimate the basic reproduction number for COVID19 [14, 17]. The advantage of compartmental models is that they can be studied both analytically and numerically.
Agentbased models can also be used to describe the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. These models provide a more accurate description of the interactions that take place between individuals. Interagent communication can be implemented using a dynamic network [5, 1]. These individualbased models provide an accurate description of the transmission dynamics that are specific for different regions and countries [6]. In a recent study, an individualbased model was used to assess the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the COVID19 outbreak in 11 European countries [7]. Social force models provide a more realistic description of the motion of individuals in crowds and under other various conditions [9]. A social force model was used to simulate the spread of a disease in an airplane [16]. Multiscale modelling is a mechanismbased approach that integrates the available knowledge and data across several scales of space and time. As a result, dynamics of disease transmission are simulated within and betweenhost organisms [8]. Thus, the response of each individual to the infection can depend on his immune system and health condition.
In this paper, we apply a previously developed model [4] to assess the impact of restricted population movement and mandatory maskwearing on the transmission dynamics of COVID19 in Morocco. The objective of this work is not to provide accurate predictions on the evolution of the epidemic but rather to understand and quantify the impact of the adopted strategy on disease propagation. To achieve this, we use a social force model to describe the random walk of individuals. We consider two modes of disease transmission. First, through direct persontoperson contact. Second, through contact with contaminated surfaces. Infected individuals do not develop symptoms until the end of the incubation period. They remain for a few days on the computational domain and then go into quarantine. The death probability of each individual agent depends on its age and health conditions. We begin by studying the impact of the restricted population movement and mandatory maskwearing. We do this by reproducing the reported data for confirmed cases first. Then, we repeat the same simulation but without control measures and compare the obtained results.
2 Multiscale modelling of COVID19 transmission dynamics in Morocco
In this work, we adapt a previously developed multiscale model [4] to simulate the transmission dynamics of COVID19 in Morocco. The model describes the spread of the disease in a population of individuals that move randomly in a square domain of 250 × 250 m^{2}. We introduce agents at random locations of the domain at the beginning of each simulation and we consider that one agent is infected with COVID19 and symptomatic. The model describes the movement of individual agents using a social force model. It considers both the modes of direct and indirect transmissions. We consider that infected individuals start transmitting the disease during the terminal stages of the incubation period. The mortality risk of each patient depends on its age and health conditions. We set periodic boundary conditions at the four boundaries to approximate larger systems.
The model is based on several assumptions. Therefore, it is not suitable to provide accurate predictions of the epidemic evolution in the next few weeks. Still, it can be used to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of restricted population movement and maskwearing on the spread of the disease. The first assumption is that we simulate the transmission dynamics in a closed system of individuals. This is because of the suspended flights and closed borders. Children are not considered in the present study as they are not too much impacted by the virus. Furthermore, we assume that the only cause of death in the model is by COVID19 during the simulated period to simplify theinterpretation of the results. Finally, we consider only presymptomatic transmission but not asymptomatic one. This is because there are few reported cases of asymptomatic carriers who are not presymptomatic. We have shown a snapshot of a numerical simulation of the model in Figure 1A.
Figure 1 (A) Snapshot of a numerical simulation of the model. Spheres represent agents moving in a square section of 250 m × 250 m. The color of each agent represents the class to which its belong: white for susceptible and immunized, green for infected, orange for symptomatic, and yellow for quarantined. The concentration of stable SARSCoV2 on hard surfaces is represented using the gradient of the green color. (B) The clinical course of COVID19 patients in the model. 
2.1 Agent displacement
We use a social force model [9] to describe the motion of each individual agent. The model was used previously to describe the movement of pedestrian in crowded areas [11]. We model each agent as a sphere particle which is subjected to several forces. We apply Newton’s law to the center of each agent: (2.1) (2.2)
where x_{i} is the displacement of the agent, v_{i} is its velocity, m_{i} is its mass, ξ_{i} is a random perturbation and f^{self} is the selfdriven force defined by:
v_{d,i} is the desired velocity at which the ith pedestrian wants to move. We consider that agents tend to move to random directions, the amplitude of the desired speed is chosen to be following a normal distribution with an average of 1.34 m.s^{−1} (≃ 5 km h^{−1}) and a standard deviation of 0.26 m.s^{−1}, τ_{i} is a relaxation time. Numerical values of parameters are provided in Table 1.
2.2 Modes of disease transmission
We consider that contagious individuals can transmit the disease by two means. First, they can infect susceptible individuals if they get into direct with them. We consider that each susceptible individual have a probability p_{d} to contract thevirus upon direct contact with a contagious agent. Second, infectious contaminate neighboring surfaces by secretingdroplets which contain the virus. These surfaces can subsequently transmit the virus to susceptible individuals. We describe the concentration of stable SARSCoV2 on hard surfaces as follows: (2.3)
where W_{i} is the secretion rate of the virus by infected individuals and σ is the degradation rate of stable SARSCoV2. The probability of viral infection by touching hard surfaces is estimated as: (2.4)
where λ is a positive constant taken smaller than one. Note that for indirect transmission to take place, the individual has to touch the contaminated surface and then his or her face before washing their hands. Therefore, we only evaluate the possibility of indirect transmission once each day for each agent at a random moment of the day.
2.3 Clinical course of infected patients
Infected agents do not develop symptoms until the end of the incubation period. We consider that they start transmitting the virus a day before the onset of symptoms [22]. We have studied the effect of presymptomatic transmission on the transmission dynamics of COVID19 in a previous study [4]. The median value for the incubation period is 5.1 days and we use a lognormal distribution to sample this period for each agent [13, 12]. After the development of symptoms, infected agents remain for a few days in the computational domain. Then, they get isolated and go into quarantine at home or in a hospital. In this period of quarantine, the patient stops moving in the computational domain and interacting with other agents. This phase can have two outcomes: the patient can either die or survive. If he or she survives, then they start moving as before and they become immunized to new infections. Median values for characteristic periods and the distribution used for their sampling them are given in Table 2. We represent the evolution of infected individuals in Figure 1B.
Values of the considered COVID19 characteristics in the model.
2.4 Demographic characteristics and mortality risks
We consider that the death probability for each patient depends on its characteristics and in particular age and preexisting risk factors. We represent the agestructure as a distribution function and we use it to sample the age of each patient. We consider that the age of each agent determines the risk of its COVID19related mortality as represented in Table 3 [18].
An individual can also have one or many of the preexisting risk factors which increase the mortality risk of COVID19. These risk factors include chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, elevated blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer. We consider that the prevalence of these health conditions to be similar to the one observed in society. Table 4 provides the prevalence of these conditions and the corresponding death probability taken from a World Health Organization report [21].
The prevalence of age groups in the model and the corresponding mortality risk for each group.
The prevalence of COVID19 mortality risk factors in the model and the corresponding death probability.
2.5 Computer implementation
The model is implemented using the C++ language. To ensure code modularity, we have used an objectoriented programming (OOP) architecture. The average CPU time of a numerical simulation of 120 days of transmission dynamics is around 3.4 h in a computer with four cores and 6 Gb of RAM. The postprocessing of the results was done using the ParaView software and python scripts. The code can be accessed at: https://github.com/MPS7/SIMCoV
3 Results
3.1 Numerical simulation of COVID19 transmission dynamics in Morocco
We begin by studying the dynamics of COVID19 transmission in Morocco. To achieve this, we fit two of the model parameters to reproduce the reported data on cumulative cases as of April 10,2020 [15]. These two parameters are the probabilities of direct transmission (p_{d}) and indirect transmission (p_{ind}). We consider that the state of health emergency imposed on March 20, 2020, corresponds to the immobilization of 60% of the population. This is because the curfew begins each day from 6 pm to 6 am. Furthermore, Medical and banking personnel as well as logistics workers handling consumer goods, agricultural produce, pharmaceutical products, medical supplies and equipment, post are exempt from curfew restrictions. The mandatory wearing of face masks was imposed on April 6, 2020. Individuals were required to wear face masks if they move outside home. We model this measure by reducing the probability of transmitting or contracting the disease for mobile agents by half. Furthermore, we consider that these mobile agents have a lower production rate of the virus. Hence, we consider that the value of SARSCoV2 production rate (W_{i}) for mobile agents is half the normal value for immobilized individuals.
Restricting the movement of the population results in a reduction of the probability of persontoperson contact. The wearing of face masks reduces the probabilities of direct and indirect transmission. Virus transmission begins two days after the introduction of the first case due to presymptomatic transmission. A few symptomatic individuals transmit the disease when the restricted movement measure starts. Immobilized agents contaminate neighbouring surfaces with a higher SARSCoV2 concentration than mobile individuals. The peak of the epidemic, which corresponds to the stabilization of the daily number of new cases, is reached on April 21, 2020. At this moment, a portion of the individuals is infected and a part of them is quarantined. The spread of the disease is stopped when all infected individuals are quarantined and the concentration of the virus on the stable surfaces reaches zero. The results of a numerical simulation for the transmission dynamics of COVID19 in Morocco are shown in Figure 2. According to the model predictions, the peak is reached on April 21, 2020. The cumulative fraction of infected cases out of detected susceptible individuals is 30.8%. The percent of deceased agents is 2.4% which corresponds to a case fatality rate (CFR) of 7.7%. The last case of infection takes place on May 16, 2020. However, it takes one additional month for the number of active infected cases to reach zero. In the remainder of the paper, we refer to this strategy as scenario III.
Figure 2 Snapshots of a numerical simulation corresponding to the COVID19 transmission dynamics in Morocco. i) A few days after the confirmation of the first case. Some of the infected cases started transmitting the virus before they develop symptoms. ii) The state of a health emergency is imposed. A few agents are infected. Some are quarantined and one is symptomatic. iii) The situation when the mandatory wearing of face masks was imposed. Some cases are infected. Immobilized agents can contaminate local surfaces with a high concentration of the virus upon infection. iv) The peak of the epidemic. A significant fraction of agents is infected. v) The spread of the disease is over. All active cases are quarantined and cannot transmit the virus. vi) The epidemic is resolved and a few remaining cases are quarantined. A portion of the population is immunized to the disease. 
3.2 Restricted movement of population and mandatory wearing of face masks reduce the total number of COVID19 cases by 64%
We consider the same parameters of the previous simulation and we lift the measure of mandatory wearing of face masks. We refer to this strategy as scenario II. In this case, the cumulative percent of infected cases increases to 42.4%. The cumulative percent of deaths is 3.2% which corresponds to a CFR equal to 7.5%. If we do not consider the restriction of movement, the cumulative percent of infected cases reaches 86.4%. This shows that the adopted measures would reduce the cumulative percent of COVID19 by 64%. If no measures were adopted, the cumulative percent of deceased patients would reach 4% of the detected susceptible population. We designate this situation as scenario I. The effect of the adopted measures on the percent of infected cases is presented on Figure 3 and the cumulative percent of deceased agents for the three scenarios is show in Figure 3B.
To better understand the dynamics of COVID19 transmission, we study the evolution of the active percents of infected and symptomatic agents for each of these three cases. In the scenario I, the epidemic peak is reached on May 3, 2020. The last infection takes place on May 16, 2020, and the epidemic is resolved on June 14, 2020. When we consider that the movement of population is restricted, the peak of the epidemic is reached on April 25, 2020. The last case is reported on May 05, 2020 and the epidemic ends on June 03, 2020. We have represented the evolution of the active percent of infected and symptomatic agents in Figure 4. The results of the three simulations are summarized in Table 5.
Among the goals of adopting nonpharmacological interventions is to reduce the burden on the health care system. Indeed, reducing the chances of disease transmission decreases the active number of individuals who requiretreatment. The model can be used to estimate the burden on the health system. Indeed, we compute the active percent of quarantined individuals for the three scenarios (Fig. 5). In the absence of control measures, the percent of quarantined agents is expected to reach 38% during the peak of the epidemic. When we restrict the movement of the population, the maximum percent of quarantined percent becomes 15.5%. Finally, when we consider the mandatory wearing of masks in addition to the restricted movement of the population, the maximum percent of quarantined individuals falls to 10.3%.
Figure 3 A) The cumulative percent of infected cases over time according to the model predictions for three different epidemic control strategies. The reported data as of April 10, 2020 is shown as well. B) The total percent of deceased agents according to the model predictions and the reported data [15] as of April 10, 2020. 
Figure 4 The active percent of infected cases (A) and the active percent of symptomatic cases (B) for three different scenarios. 
Asummary of the model predictions for the three scenarios. The dates are given in the dd/mm/yyyy format.
Figure 5 The active percent of quarantined cases for the three different scenarios. 
3.3 Restricted movement and mandatory maskwearing increase the incidence of indirect transmission
One of the main features of SARSCoV2 is its relatively high halflife time on hard surfaces. As a result, the chances of indirect transmission of the disease can be considerable. We represent the average concentration of the virus over time in the computational domain for the three scenarios in Figure 6. As expected, the concentration of the viable virus is higher when the control measures are not adopted. We calculate the ratio of indirect transmissions as the percent of indirect transmissions out of the total number of infections. We present the relative incidence of indirect transmissions for the three cases in Table 6. When the control measures are considered, the rate of indirect transmission increases despite the lower concentration of the virus. Indeed, the restricted movement of the population and the mandatory wearing of masks mainly reduce the chances of persontoperson contact and direct transmission.
Figure 6 The average concentration of stable SARSCoV2 in the computational domain over time. 
The rate of indirect disease transmission for each case.
3.4 Lifting control measures before the end of the epidemic results in the resurgence of the outbreak
Limiting the movement of the population has several economic and social impacts. Therefore, it is important to be able to relax or completely lift epidemic control measures as soon as possible. We investigate the effects of lifting nonpharmaceutic interventions during the final phase of the epidemic. We consider that the control measures are lifting on May 15, 2020. At this moment of the simulation, there is still five symptomatic agents that are not quarantined yet and the surfaces are still contaminated. As a result, we observe that the cumulative percent of infected individuals do not stabilize but starts growing exponentially again (Fig. 7). Therefore, lifting control measures should only take place when all infected cases are quarantined and when the concentration of the virus on the computational domain reaches zero.
Figure 7 The cumulative percent of infected cases when control measures are maintained until the end vs. when they are lifted before the end of the epidemic. 
4 Discussion
In this work, we apply a previously developed multiscale model [4] to quantify the effect of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the transmission dynamics of COVID19 in Morocco. The model uses a social force model to describe the motion of individuals which makes it suitable for the simulation of the impact of NPIs on the movement of the population. It considers both modes of direct and indirect transmission. Furthermore, it takes into account presymptomatic transmission which characterizes COVID19 infection. We assign an age to each agent which determines its mortality risk. Agents can also have one or more of the mortality risk factors. Themultiscale structure of the model allowed us to integrate the available data on COVID19 transmission and infection dynamics at the individual and population levels. According to the model predictions, the adoption of epidemic control measures would reduce the cumulative number of infected cases by 64%. This is because the restriction of movement decreases the probability of direct contact while the wearing of masks reduces the probabilities of direct and indirect disease transmission. The obtained results suggest that the adopted measures would reduce the number of infected cases but they would not shorten the duration of the epidemic. Furthermore, Numerical simulations reveal that these measures reduce the concentration of stable virus on the computational domain. However, the rate of indirect transmission increases when the movement of the population is limited and the wearing of masks is mandatory. This suggests that other measures that target the mode of indirect transmission will have a significant impact and will further reduce the number of infected cases. Indeed, the disinfection of public areas wouldreduce virus concentration and decrease the incidence of indirect transmissions. Finally, the model suggests that the early lifting of NPIs could result in a resurgence of the epidemic. Therefore, it is important to wait until all infected cases are quarantined and that stable SARSCoV2 on hard surfaces hasdecayed. We will study the relaxation strategies of epidemic control measures in a forthcoming work.
The goal of this study is to assess the impact of NPIs on the transmission dynamics of COVID19 in Morocco. It is not to give accurate predictions on the evolution of the epidemic situation. Indeed, the model relies on several assumptions which can be hard to verify in reality. First, the model does not consider the effect of children in transmitting the virus. This assumption was considered because children are supposed to be staying at home because of school closures. Second, we assume that patients who survived the disease become immune to new infections. However, the development of immunity to COVID19 upon infection is still under investigation. Second, the model assumes that all cases of asymptomatic transmission are presymptomatic. In the absence of sufficient data on the infection dynamics in asymptomatic cases, we consider all susceptible individuals to be potentially symptomatic. Third, the model considers a relatively low number of agents. The use of a small time step in numerical simulation is necessary to track all contacts between individuals. This significantly increases the CPU time. Finally, data concerning the mortality of COVID19 were taken from clinical studies conducted in China. In a forthcoming work, we will develop an immunoepidemiological model by coupling the present model with another model describing the hostspecific immune response of infected individuals [3].
References
 M. Ajelli, B. Gonçalves, D. Balcan, V. Colizza, H. Hu, J.J. Ramasco, S. Merler and A. Vespignani, Comparing largescale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: agentbased versus structured metapopulation models. BMC Infect. Dis. 10 (2010) 190. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 L.J. Allen, Some discretetime si, sir, and sis epidemic models. Math. Biosci. 124 (1994) 83–105. [Google Scholar]
 M. Banerjee, A. Tokarev and V. Volpert, Immunoepidemiological model of twostage epidemic growth. Preprint arXiv:2003.14152 (2020). [Google Scholar]
 A. Bouchnita and A. Jebrane, A hybrid multiscale model of covid19 transmission dynamics to assess the potential of nonpharmaceutical interventions. Preprint medRxiv 10.1101/2020.04.05.20054460 (2020). [Google Scholar]
 W. Dong, K. Heller and A.S. Pentland, Modeling infection with multiagent dynamics, in International Conference on Social Computing, BehavioralCultural Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, Berlin (2012) 172–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 N.M. Ferguson, D.A. Cummings, C. Fraser, J.C. Cajka, P.C. Cooley and D.S. Burke, Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature 442 (2006) 448–452. [Google Scholar]
 S. Flaxman, S. Mishra, A. Gandy, H. Unwin, H. Coupland, T. Mellan, H. Zhu, T. Berah, J. Eaton, P. Perez Guzman, et al. Report 13: Estimating the number of infections and the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on covid19 in 11 Europeancountries (2020). [Google Scholar]
 W. Garira, A complete categorization of multiscale models of infectious disease systems. J. Biol. Dyn. 11 (2017) 378–435. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 D. Helbing and P. Molnar, Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995) 4282. [Google Scholar]
 D.S. Hui, E.I. Azhar, T.A. Madani, F. Ntoumi, R. Kock, O. Dar, G. Ippolito, T.D. Mchugh, Z.A. Memish, C. Drosten, et al. The continuing 2019ncov epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health–thelatest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 91 (2020) 264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 B. Kabalan, P. Argoul, A. Jebrane, G. Cumunel and S. Erlicher, A crowd movement model for pedestrian flow through bottlenecks. Ann. Solid Struct. Mech. 8 (2016) 1–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S.A. Lauer, K.H. Grantz, Q. Bi, F.K. Jones, Q. Zheng, H.R. Meredith, A.S. Azman, N.G. Reich and J. Lessler, The incubation period of coronavirusdisease 2019 (covid19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann. Internal Med. 172 (2020) 577–582. [Google Scholar]
 N.M. Linton, T. Kobayashi, Y. Yang, K. Hayashi, A.R. Akhmetzhanov, S.m. Jung, B. Yuan, R. Kinoshita and H. Nishiura, Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: a statistical analysis of publicly available case data. J. Clin. Med. 9 (2020) 538. [Google Scholar]
 Y. Liu, A.A. Gayle, A. WilderSmith and J. Rocklöv, The reproductive number of covid19 is higher compared to sars coronavirus. J. Travel Med. 27 (2020) taaa021. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 M. Ministère de la santé, Bulletin hebdomadaire covid 19. Available at: http://www.covidmaroc.ma/ (2020). [Google Scholar]
 S. Namilae, A. Srinivasan, A. Mubayi, M. Scotch and R. Pahle, Selfpropelled pedestrian dynamics model: Application to passenger movement and infection propagation in airplanes. Physica A 465 (2017) 248–260. [Google Scholar]
 J. Rocklöv, H. Sjödin and A. WilderSmith, Covid19 outbreak on the diamond princess cruise ship: estimating the epidemic potential and effectiveness of public health countermeasures. To appear in: J. Travel Medicine (2020) taaa030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 V. Surveillances, The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreakof 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (covid19)–China, 2020. China CDC Weekly 2 (2020) 113–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 N. van Doremalen, T. Bushmaker, D.H. Morris, M.G. Holbrook, A. Gamble, B.N. Williamson, A. Tamin, J.L. Harcourt, N.J. Thornburg, S.I. Gerber, et al., Aerosol and surface stability of sarscov2 as compared with sarscov1. New Engl. J. Med. 382 (2020) 1564–1567. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 V. Volpert, M. Banerjee and S. Petrovskii, On a quarantine model of coronavirus infection and data analysis. MMNP 15 (2020) 24. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid19) situation report41. [Google Scholar]
 World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid19) situation report73. [Google Scholar]
All Tables
The prevalence of age groups in the model and the corresponding mortality risk for each group.
The prevalence of COVID19 mortality risk factors in the model and the corresponding death probability.
Asummary of the model predictions for the three scenarios. The dates are given in the dd/mm/yyyy format.
All Figures
Figure 1 (A) Snapshot of a numerical simulation of the model. Spheres represent agents moving in a square section of 250 m × 250 m. The color of each agent represents the class to which its belong: white for susceptible and immunized, green for infected, orange for symptomatic, and yellow for quarantined. The concentration of stable SARSCoV2 on hard surfaces is represented using the gradient of the green color. (B) The clinical course of COVID19 patients in the model. 

In the text 
Figure 2 Snapshots of a numerical simulation corresponding to the COVID19 transmission dynamics in Morocco. i) A few days after the confirmation of the first case. Some of the infected cases started transmitting the virus before they develop symptoms. ii) The state of a health emergency is imposed. A few agents are infected. Some are quarantined and one is symptomatic. iii) The situation when the mandatory wearing of face masks was imposed. Some cases are infected. Immobilized agents can contaminate local surfaces with a high concentration of the virus upon infection. iv) The peak of the epidemic. A significant fraction of agents is infected. v) The spread of the disease is over. All active cases are quarantined and cannot transmit the virus. vi) The epidemic is resolved and a few remaining cases are quarantined. A portion of the population is immunized to the disease. 

In the text 
Figure 3 A) The cumulative percent of infected cases over time according to the model predictions for three different epidemic control strategies. The reported data as of April 10, 2020 is shown as well. B) The total percent of deceased agents according to the model predictions and the reported data [15] as of April 10, 2020. 

In the text 
Figure 4 The active percent of infected cases (A) and the active percent of symptomatic cases (B) for three different scenarios. 

In the text 
Figure 5 The active percent of quarantined cases for the three different scenarios. 

In the text 
Figure 6 The average concentration of stable SARSCoV2 in the computational domain over time. 

In the text 
Figure 7 The cumulative percent of infected cases when control measures are maintained until the end vs. when they are lifted before the end of the epidemic. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.